Re:50 SWAT officers bombard, destroy bystander’s house with ...
by PeachPlum on Thursday November 23, 2017 @02:33AM
(#15763490)
A guy with a semi-automatic pistol who had fired on officers, "it's ok, we have his name and address"
Glad I don't live in Germany.
Re:50 SWAT officers bombard, destroy bystander’s house with ...
by hutzlibu on Thursday November 23, 2017 @07:25AM
(#15764573)
.. it is also not true. They would siege the house. And wait for him to give up.
Re:50 SWAT officers bombard, destroy bystander’s house with ...
by PeachPlum on Friday November 24, 2017 @02:21AM
(#15769902)
Also not true, here's an example from July 2016
Stuttgart siege: Two dead after '100 armed police storm hostage situation' at law firm
Five hour stand-off ends after special forces called in
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/stuttgart-hos...
Re:50 SWAT officers bombard, destroy bystander’s house with ...
by hutzlibu on Friday November 24, 2017 @02:31AM
(#15769935)
Yeah but this was a hostage situation.
We were talking about a situation, where a lone, armed fugitive has barricaded himself in some place.
And in this situation, there is no need at all for storming.
Turning off the water and wait outside, should be enough.
As an dual citizen that grew up in America, this is shocking to me, but it seems to work here in Germany. Of course, Germany has national address registration and doesn’t the same level of gun ownership..
Just wanted to point out a different approach.