News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Looking at how many sites use vulnerable JavaScript libra... by jjnoakes on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @02:46PM (#15759887)
Those means different things.

Their wording means "we checked X sites and 77% of them met some criteria", which can be extrapolated to higher values of X (assuming the proper statistical care is taken, etc).

Your wording implies the same, but that's not good because you can't extrapolate to a larger X. You chose the sites after knowing they already met the criteria, and that changes the meaning.

Re:Looking at how many sites use vulnerable JavaScript libra... by spurcell93 on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @03:38PM (#15760385)
I get the sense OP was being a bit snide
Re:Looking at how many sites use vulnerable JavaScript libra... by bigiain on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @10:41PM (#15762571)
The snide version would be "100% of 433,000". (Which is what I initially parsed it as, and nodded in agreement...)