News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Open Letter to the FCC by dmalvarado on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @01:28PM (#15759150)
Let's wait and see where he ends up. If he doesn't immediately go back to telecom after his appointment is over, then I'll agree bringing up his history wasn't warranted.
Re:An Open Letter to the FCC by epmaybe on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @01:45PM (#15759316)
I'm curious, where would you expect someone with years of experience in a specific industry to go after public office? Besides public office, of course.
Re:An Open Letter to the FCC by rapind on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @01:53PM (#15759378)
A company that didn't benefit from his appointment. Is that crazy to expect? Is it really that hard to find?
Re:An Open Letter to the FCC by mattnewton on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @01:53PM (#15759384)
Not into the arms of a large company they were regulating. It means they have a massive conflict of interests.
Re:An Open Letter to the FCC by learc83 on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @01:55PM (#15759399)
Yeah, it's the obvious choice for him, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't set up perverse incentives.
Re:An Open Letter to the FCC by erikpukinskis on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @03:10PM (#15760123)
If I wrote regulations that benefitted Google, I would hope I’d go work at Qualcomm or somewhere unrelated. It gives the appearance of quid pro quo.
Re:An Open Letter to the FCC by epmaybe on Friday November 24, 2017 @12:39AM (#15769632)
If I started selling a product that may have benefited a future employer, should I not work for that employer in the future? Not saying these are at all equivalent situations given the amount of power Pai but curious all the same.