News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Problem of Doctors’ Salaries by chimeracoder on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @12:41PM (#15758714)
> Some providers are more efficient then others so a statement that medicare reimburses below cost is not accurate. Maybe some procedures reimburse below cost but not all do.

I never said all do - I said that in aggregate, Medicare reimbursements are 7% less than COGS. "Efficiency" doesn't really enter the picture, because COGS isn't driven by efficiency (ie, overhead); it's driven by upstream costs.

> So logically it is better to employ more residents if you have sufficient patient load since it would reduce COGs.

Nope, none of the stuff you mentioned falls under COGS.

> One could argue that medicaid and medicare patients are sicker and there are more of them than most so they provide a larger revenue stream than private insurance covered patients (and they also require more procedures)

This is the classic "we'll lose money per customer, but make it up in volume" argument.

Re:The Problem of Doctors’ Salaries by sjg007 on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @01:19PM (#15759073)
>Nope, none of the stuff you mentioned falls under COGS.

Ok, then please define what you mean by COGs.

>This is the classic "we'll lose money per customer, but make it up in volume" argument.

You misunderstand the argument. Since I wasn't clear, these two articles highlight the main points:

https://www.kff.org/report-section/a-primer-on-medicare-how-...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/medicare-pri...

Also with respect to these and the efficiency argument, please see:

https://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/hospitals-medic...