I never said all do - I said that in aggregate, Medicare reimbursements are 7% less than COGS. "Efficiency" doesn't really enter the picture, because COGS isn't driven by efficiency (ie, overhead); it's driven by upstream costs.
> So logically it is better to employ more residents if you have sufficient patient load since it would reduce COGs.
Nope, none of the stuff you mentioned falls under COGS.
> One could argue that medicaid and medicare patients are sicker and there are more of them than most so they provide a larger revenue stream than private insurance covered patients (and they also require more procedures)
This is the classic "we'll lose money per customer, but make it up in volume" argument.
Ok, then please define what you mean by COGs.
>This is the classic "we'll lose money per customer, but make it up in volume" argument.
You misunderstand the argument. Since I wasn't clear, these two articles highlight the main points:
https://www.kff.org/report-section/a-primer-on-medicare-how-...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/medicare-pri...
Also with respect to these and the efficiency argument, please see:
https://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/hospitals-medic...