Re:Belgium says loot boxes are gambling, wants them banned i...
by dkersten on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @07:18AM
(#15756203)
More and more sites are doing this, and more and more am I realising that I really don't care to read the articles enough to enable javascript/disable adblockers. A nice side benefit is that I'm consuming much less content that, really, I don't need. Most news articles for example don't affect my life other than, perhaps, depressing me. If its not actionable, I don't need to know. These sites are helping me (slowly) unravel my internet addiction. So really, I should be thanking them :)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Belgium says loot boxes are gambling, wants them banned i...
by Artemix on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @07:57AM
(#15756379)
That's the positive side of it.
The most negative ones would be: - Content blocking: you limit access to your news to a very precise subset of people, so implicitly easily targeting and closing users's views. - Heaviness: you limit access to your news to mainly desktop targets, as most mobile networks have very limited bandwidth usage.
Also it have a positive impact on you, also me (as I decided to add it and all its subdomains to my blocklist) but a lot of users will keep living under those website's constraints, but also gaining the habit of that, thus starting to think about it as "normal" where it's really the Web and net neutrality cancer.