Re:What's wrong with the default build tool for Scala
by pjmlp on Monday November 20, 2017 @12:30PM
(#15741558)
Surely.
Maven doesn't require 2 GB, a SSD, a background daemon and different dependency commands to be fast.
Also Maven has never been four years in a row subject of build performance at multiple conferences.
For those that don't suffer from XML allergy, Maven is quite alright, IDEs can
provide completions that actually make sense and nice graphical tooling for dependency management.
Maven doesn't require 2 GB, a SSD, a background daemon and different dependency commands to be fast.
Also Maven has never been four years in a row subject of build performance at multiple conferences.
For those that don't suffer from XML allergy, Maven is quite alright, IDEs can provide completions that actually make sense and nice graphical tooling for dependency management.