News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla Semi by Dylan16807 on Friday November 17, 2017 @05:07AM (#15720678)
30 square meters, laying flat. So maybe 3kW. While the engines need more like 100kW.

You can't effectively power any vehicle with 15% efficient solar panels.

Re:Tesla Semi by larkeith on Saturday November 18, 2017 @09:42PM (#15731963)
One note, your second claim is not entirely true - while land vehicles are a ways from being feasible to power with photovoltaics (although I would have to do the math for trains, which may be close), we already have primarily [1] and exclusively [2] solar-powered aircraft.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_Impulse#Solar_Impulse_2_...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helios_Prototype

Re:Tesla Semi by Dylan16807 on Tuesday November 21, 2017 @07:33AM (#15747439)
Those aircraft limp along at a tenth the speed of a typical commercial flight. That's the main reason I said "effectively". I mean, there are useless pure-solar cars too.

Trains might be closer but when single locomotives are measured in megawatts I'm not very confident.

Re:Tesla Semi by larkeith on Friday November 17, 2017 @05:39AM (#15720846)
No, but you can improve the range by a few percent.
Re:Tesla Semi by hermenaut on Saturday November 18, 2017 @04:10PM (#15730712)
until you consider the weight of the solar panel
Re:Tesla Semi by larkeith on Saturday November 18, 2017 @09:36PM (#15731939)
Going with a weight of 20 lbs/m^2, that's only 600 lbs - less than 1% of the fully-loaded weight.

It's fairly likely one could get well below that mass using some of the more experimental solar panel designs (such as those in use for solar aircraft), but it would probably not be cost-efficient .