News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Shock of Sweden's Housing Market Is Hitting the Count... by bluGill on Wednesday November 15, 2017 @11:19AM (#15704832)
That depends. Location location location. The right answer changes based on what side of the city you live in. As such nobody can give a definitive answer.

In all but the smallest cities you have options for a different job. They might not be as good, but there is an option. If you lose your job you can find a different job close enough to your current house that you don't have to move.

Remember this is NOT an rational economic problem. There are good reasons to live near by the same neighbors that you know well for years. There are good reasons to live near your family. When you own a house you can make modifications to support your hobbies which in turn make your house a better place for your to live than anyone else. These all mean there are good reasons to accept a job that pays less than you could earn elsewhere and thus stay in the same house. With inflation you can probably afford the house on a lesser paying job after a few years.

Re:The Shock of Sweden's Housing Market Is Hitting the Count... by aeorgnoieang on Wednesday November 15, 2017 @12:22PM (#15705498)
> Remember this is NOT an rational economic problem. There are good reasons to live near by the same neighbors that you know well for years.

Why is a living near the same people you know and love irrational or somehow an inappropriate object of economic reasoning? You could even estimate prices for such things! Just because they're not typically represented as currency amounts doesn't mean they're not 'rationally economic' or that making tradeoffs that involve these things couldn't be better done with good economics.

Re:The Shock of Sweden's Housing Market Is Hitting the Count... by bluGill on Wednesday November 15, 2017 @01:10PM (#15706091)
Generally rational economics assumes someone who is rationally trying to optimizes for other factors.

You are correct that it is fully rational behavior for people. However that is not the definition used in economics. (sort of like physics tends to assume no friction where possible)

Re:The Shock of Sweden's Housing Market Is Hitting the Count... by sjy on Wednesday November 15, 2017 @03:24PM (#15707408)
No such assumptions are made in the axioms of VNM-rationality[1] or any other model of rationality of which I am aware. If it is not rational to live near people you like it is difficult to see why it would be pay more for a house with any other luxury.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann–Morgenstern_utilit...

Re:The Shock of Sweden's Housing Market Is Hitting the Count... by nerfhammer on Wednesday November 15, 2017 @01:58PM (#15706683)
Strangling the growth of cities and labor mobility is very much a rational economic problem:

* https://www.axios.com/sky-high-home-prices-are-thwarting-thw...

* https://www.citylab.com/equity/2017/06/the-other-side-of-har...

Cf. China, which has seen unbelievably explosive growth in its cities in the last 40 years and China has also seen ~1 billion people lifted out of poverty during exactly the same time period.

Re:The Shock of Sweden's Housing Market Is Hitting the Count... by seanmcdirmid on Wednesday November 15, 2017 @03:19PM (#15707370)
Sure. This is inspite of the hukou system, which is basically a kind of apartheid that keeps rural migrants from receiving services in the urban locales they are working at.