News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber’s Driver Dilemma: Fare Hikes and Cuts Don’t Change Pay by taneq on Monday November 13, 2017 @07:46PM (#15691651)
Thanks!

> All of this means Uber, and other ride-sharing services, must lean heavily on pricey incentive payments—cash for completing a certain number of rides a week, say—to bring driver earnings above what typically amounts to around minimum wage

This seems kind of obvious to me. Uber's main drawcard for drivers is that there's almost no barrier to entry. Most jobs earning more than minimum wage have some significant barrier to entry (required qualifications, experience, skills, knowing the right people etc.) and so if Uber pays more than minimum wage, anyone in a minimum wage job will switch to driving for Uber. This lowers individual earnings for drivers until other low-barrier-to-entry minimum-wage jobs become competitive again and drivers start switching back to those jobs.

Re:Uber’s Driver Dilemma: Fare Hikes and Cuts Don’t Change Pay by chrisbennet on Monday November 13, 2017 @09:31PM (#15692148)
You need a suitable car in order to drive for Uber don’t you? That would be a barrier for entry for many minimum wage employees I think.
Re:Uber’s Driver Dilemma: Fare Hikes and Cuts Don’t Change Pay by crdb on Monday November 13, 2017 @09:54PM (#15692237)
Uber owns and runs rental car companies, such as Lion City Rental in Singapore, whose fee structure is designed specifically for the car-less to sign up as drivers (minimum rental duration for discounts to apply, a discount based on Uber rides driven, etc.).

Lion City Rental has grown so fast as to affect the price of the car ownership permit [1]. Anecdotally, about 1 in 20 of my drivers in Singapore owned their cars.

[1] http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/transport/uber-bids-co...