News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An ARM killer from IIT-M? by phkahler on Monday November 13, 2017 @07:55AM (#15686143)
You said "open source Rust based MK OS..." Does that mean an OS written in Rust? I had not heard of that. As I recall the Rust support for RISC-V is quite limited for now until the LLVM patches go upstream (which will be soon).

I agree with your statement "I have no idea how successful we will be and I frankly do not care." There will be a lot of benefits as a result of this work regardless of the immediate outcome. Keep building the future!

There are a lot of comments here on HN that seem completely uninformed of what's actually happening with RISC-V. They are about to be surprised.

Re:An ARM killer from IIT-M? by gsmadhusudan on Monday November 13, 2017 @10:39AM (#15687189)
Rust support is getting better. Our Rust OS is lower priority but it is needed for our tagged ISA support since we need language extensions to add security semantics to pointers. Also Rust is a much safer language. We need all this since safety critical systems is a key Shakti target.
Re:An ARM killer from IIT-M? by jabl on Monday November 13, 2017 @10:48AM (#15687267)
Is this similar to the stuff lowrisc is doing?
Re:An ARM killer from IIT-M? by gsmadhusudan on Monday November 13, 2017 @11:20PM (#15692627)
Yes, we are also collaborating with them. The HW is the simpler problem to solve. SW life-cycle for creating tags, embedding them in the code and ensuring that teh binary has not been tampered is the challenge and to ensure portable tag semantics. We have a dedicated security group working on it. Unlike US universities we have carte blanche for hiring faculty and scholarships for MS/PhD. Funding is not the issue, getting good faculty and students is ! Some of you should head over here for an MS or PhD.