Re:Widespread impact caused by Level 3 BGP route leak
by jwilk on Monday November 13, 2017 @07:45AM
(#15686061)
It took me a while to realize that "Level 3" is a company name.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Widespread impact caused by Level 3 BGP route leak
by rnhmjoj on Monday November 13, 2017 @08:11AM
(#15686266)
I know it's a company because regularly they seem to mess something up and there is a post about it on /r/networking:
https://www.reddit.com/r/networking/search?q=level+3&restric...
It's so common that someone even made a website about it: http://fuckinglevel3.com/
Re:Widespread impact caused by Level 3 BGP route leak
by DarronWyke on Monday November 13, 2017 @09:34AM
(#15686741)
Remember when they nearly broke the internet back in IIRC '06, when they had that peering dispute spat with Cogent?
Re:Widespread impact caused by Level 3 BGP route leak
by scurvy on Monday November 13, 2017 @11:18AM
(#15687538)
Telia de-peering with Cogent was bigger. And as others have pointed out, Cogent is frequently a bad partner in these disputes.
Re:Widespread impact caused by Level 3 BGP route leak
by toast0 on Monday November 13, 2017 @10:37AM
(#15687173)
Given the number of peering spats that Cogent has been in, is it fair to blame the other party when one comes up?
Re:Widespread impact caused by Level 3 BGP route leak
by tomschlick on Monday November 13, 2017 @11:43AM
(#15687756)