Re:Snap’s Rise and Fall: How a Big, Splashy IPO Prompted the...
by QML on Saturday November 11, 2017 @11:16PM
(#15679614)
I would say Snapchat is more similar to Twitter than it is to Google or to Facebook. Question is, what is there to incentivize a user to stay on the platform for a couple extra of minutes? I personally have no clue why Snapchat the company is so large — does it really need that many engineers or marketers to maintain an app that is essentially a messenger? The failed Spectacles experiment just seems to scream that this is a company with a lot of money and no clue what to do with it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Snap’s Rise and Fall: How a Big, Splashy IPO Prompted the...
by username223 on Sunday November 12, 2017 @08:25AM
(#15680770)
> The failed Spectacles experiment just seems to scream that this is a company with a lot of money and no clue what to do with it.
Spectacles look exactly like Google Glass to me, though with a bit less creepy human thumb marketing... http://static2.businessinsider.com/image/5179166eeab8ead0440...
All of the current surveillance capitalism companies seem to be flailing when it comes to doing anything beyond selling ads.