Re:Snap’s Rise and Fall: How a Big, Splashy IPO Prompted the...
by dna_polymerase on Saturday November 11, 2017 @09:04PM
(#15679301)
I remember the analysts opinion on Facebook pre-IPO. Virtually no revenue. One year later Facebook presented their first gains. While I was sure Facebook would be able to do it back then, I don't see it with Snap.
They could profit from Snapcash though. How about integrating some Patreon-esque function where you can unlock private feeds by payment/subscription? For some art-forms that could really work out well.
Re:Snap’s Rise and Fall: How a Big, Splashy IPO Prompted the...
by kss238 on Saturday November 11, 2017 @09:46PM
(#15679400)
"art-forms"
Re:Snap’s Rise and Fall: How a Big, Splashy IPO Prompted the...
by QML on Saturday November 11, 2017 @11:16PM
(#15679614)
I would say Snapchat is more similar to Twitter than it is to Google or to Facebook. Question is, what is there to incentivize a user to stay on the platform for a couple extra of minutes? I personally have no clue why Snapchat the company is so large — does it really need that many engineers or marketers to maintain an app that is essentially a messenger? The failed Spectacles experiment just seems to scream that this is a company with a lot of money and no clue what to do with it.
Re:Snap’s Rise and Fall: How a Big, Splashy IPO Prompted the...
by username223 on Sunday November 12, 2017 @08:25AM
(#15680770)
> The failed Spectacles experiment just seems to scream that this is a company with a lot of money and no clue what to do with it.
Spectacles look exactly like Google Glass to me, though with a bit less creepy human thumb marketing... http://static2.businessinsider.com/image/5179166eeab8ead0440...
All of the current surveillance capitalism companies seem to be flailing when it comes to doing anything beyond selling ads.
Its a very competitive climate and Snapchat needs to keep innovating, but I wouldn't write Snapchat off too early.