Re:Sex toy company Lovense admits its Android app locally st...
by bdcravens on Friday November 10, 2017 @06:26PM
(#15673976)
How would you tax free apps?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sex toy company Lovense admits its Android app locally st...
by dredmorbius on Friday November 10, 2017 @09:11PM
(#15674609)
In many professional contexts, a bond is required to be paid.
In the Free Software world, packaging of applications generally involves a third-party who does that packaging, and has specific guidelines to adhere to. E.g., Debian Package Maintainers and the Debian Policy Manual.
Re:Sex toy company Lovense admits its Android app locally st...
by sidlls on Friday November 10, 2017 @06:45PM
(#15674058)
Do not permit them. Free apps are just a way to reinforce the user-is-the-product problem that exists today.
Note: I don't agree with a "permissions tax."
Re:Sex toy company Lovense admits its Android app locally st...
by fleitz on Friday November 10, 2017 @06:53PM
(#15674105)
You may also want to purchase your phone from a company that isn't the world's largest advertising company.
It's kinda funny that everyone is upset about a temp file when the device itself sends their entire porn history to Google everyday of the week.
Basically, if you don't want to be spied on, stop using Google products.