News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by vtomole on Friday November 10, 2017 @01:53PM (#15672015)
Their previous offerings have been 2 physical quantum computers that can be accessed over the cloud. One with 5 qubits, and another with 16 qubits[0]. These computers have had thousands of users who have run millions of quantum algorithms [1].

[0]: https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/52403.wss

[1]:https://www.engadget.com/2017/11/10/ibm-50-qubit-quantum-com...

Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by Xeoncross on Friday November 10, 2017 @02:50PM (#15672398)
Wait, I didn't think we had actual quantum computers yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computing
Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by vtomole on Friday November 10, 2017 @03:16PM (#15672591)
We've had quantum computers since the 90's. We just haven't had "useful" quantum computers yet [0].

An implementation of quantum computers that is currently flourishing is one that is built out of superconducting circuits. This makes it easier to scale the quantum computer because you can leverage existing nanoelectronic fabrication techniques [1].

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_quantum_computing

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_quantum_comput...

Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by Xeoncross on Friday November 10, 2017 @03:24PM (#15672659)
> "We've had quantum computers since the 90's".

It wasn't until 2005 we had the first (probable) qubyte created at the University of Innsbruck in Austria.

Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by kevin_thibedeau on Friday November 10, 2017 @03:58PM (#15672978)
You don't need bytes to do computation.
Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by colejohnson66 on Friday November 10, 2017 @08:52PM (#15674560)
Wouldn't a qubyte be 8 qubits?
Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by mtgx on Saturday November 11, 2017 @04:50AM (#15675662)
The term doesn't make sense because you're not going to use groups of 8 qubits to represent characters on a screen.

We may actually need a new word for 2 qubits (dual-qubits? dubits?) because it seems 2 qubits are enough to break 1-bit of encryption, and I think I've read it's enough to simulate 1 atom, too.

Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by colejohnson66 on Saturday November 11, 2017 @05:12AM (#15675714)
I thought it was x qubits is equal to 2^x classical bits? So wouldn’t 2 “dubits” actually be four times (not twice as) better?
Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by joe_the_user on Friday November 10, 2017 @03:08PM (#15672541)
From your link: "A small 16-qubit quantum computer exists and is available for hobbyists to experiment with via the IBM quantum experience project."
Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by Xeoncross on Friday November 10, 2017 @03:16PM (#15672590)
From the link in that sentence: "The IBM Quantum Experience (QX) enables anyone to ... ... explore tutorials and simulations around what might be possible with quantum computing."
Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by joe_the_user on Friday November 10, 2017 @03:51PM (#15672915)
That sentences doesn't say the small 5 and 16 bit computers don't exist.

Edit: if you read the whole link, the key description is:

"IBM’s quantum processor is made up of superconducting transmon qubits, located in a dilution refrigerator at the IBM Research headquarters at the Thomas J. Watson Research Center.

Users interact with the quantum processor through the quantum circuit model of computation, applying quantum gates on the qubits using a GUI called the quantum composer, writing quantum assembly language code[1] or through a Python API.[2]"

Which is to say you have both a quantum computer and a simulator in IBM schema (which in the cloud 'cause you can't have supercooled chips in your basement), which is as one would expect running "real" quantum computing is going to be more expensive and uncertain now despite the hope it will give vast speed later.

Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by GreenOceanBlue on Friday November 10, 2017 @03:08PM (#15672544)
We don't.
Re:IBM Q system in development with working 50 qubit processor by pault on Friday November 10, 2017 @03:31PM (#15672723)
These types of replies aren't helpful. If you disagree with the claim please provide some specific reasons why.