News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by fapjacks on Friday November 10, 2017 @10:53AM (#15670666)
RIGHT. People complaining about these bizarre violent videos but they'll sit their kids in front of mind control all day.
Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by Knufen on Friday November 10, 2017 @03:48PM (#15672892)
Don't know why you got downvoted, have an upvote
Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by squeaky-clean on Friday November 10, 2017 @05:25PM (#15673585)
Probably because the people complaining are not the same ones who are leaving their kids unattended with these videos. This thread is full of parents saying that they banned youtube for their child because these algorithmic videos have began to fill all youtube searches for kids.

I think it's more of a "why did bots and inattentive parents fuck it up for the rest of us."

Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by alasdair_ on Friday November 10, 2017 @06:15PM (#15673906)
>I think it's more of a "why did bots and inattentive parents fuck it up for the rest of us."

The main complaint is that Youtube Kids (an explicitly kid-friendly subset of youtube, with its own app and parental controls) is being targeted in this way. I assume "the rest of us" are not generally using this version of youtube.

Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by derefr on Friday November 10, 2017 @06:53PM (#15674107)
"The rest of us" parents, not "the rest of us" people.
Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by anigbrowl on Friday November 10, 2017 @09:14PM (#15674623)
Enough with the victim blaming. I think this is a serious problem and I don't have any children to leave unattended.
Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by bigbugbag on Sunday November 12, 2017 @05:02PM (#15682864)
I'm pretty convinced the victim here is the children and the perpertrators are the parents.

Think about it: scientific consensus is pretty clear that the content makes no difference there should be no exposure to any kind of screen for kids under 6, then maybe a tiny bit until 10-12.

Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by phil248 on Friday November 10, 2017 @05:26PM (#15673591)
I assume that comment got down-voted for making a broad generalization about a huge numbers of strangers without any supporting evidence. And also for just sounding kind of like an asshole.
Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by fapjacks on Saturday November 11, 2017 @07:22AM (#15676061)
I'm guessing your assumptions get you riled up fairly often?
[dead]
Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by drdeca on Friday November 10, 2017 @04:28PM (#15673205)
I don't remember seeing "whomever" before, so I hope you don't mind me trying to understand where it is used.

I see that it is used for the object of a verb, and whoever for the subject of a verb, but I am a bit confused here, because here it is the object of "downvote", but the subject of "doubts", so I am confused.

In the sentence "I will look at whomever Bob greets.", I think I understand why it is "whomever", and in the sentence "Whoever enters the room next, they will encounter a surprise.", I think I understand why it is "whoever" and not "whomever", but in the case of your sentence, I don't know what the rule is.

Could you (or anyone else) please explain it to me?

Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by randallsquared on Friday November 10, 2017 @05:04PM (#15673438)
It's an interesting corner case. I believe it's "I will look at whomever Bob greets." (as you note) and "I will look at whoever greets Bob." The object of the preposition is the phrase "whoever greets Bob," so subject-to-a-verb wins.
Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by drdeca on Friday November 10, 2017 @05:07PM (#15673457)
Thank you!
Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by twentythree on Friday November 10, 2017 @05:08PM (#15673468)
According to [0], it seems that "whoever" would be correct here.

> Rule 1. The presence of whoever or whomever indicates a dependent clause. Use whoever or whomever to agree with the verb in that dependent clause, regardless of the rest of the sentence.

> Examples:

> Give it to whoever/whomever asks for it first.

> He asks for it first. Therefore, whoever is correct.

[0]: http://www.grammarbook.com/grammar/whoever.asp

Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by emodendroket on Friday November 10, 2017 @05:16PM (#15673527)
Try substituting him for whom and he for who. That'll see you through most of the time.
Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by ascorbic on Friday November 10, 2017 @04:19PM (#15673141)
I'll go out on a limb and guess you don't have kids, right?
Re:YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeti... by ceejayoz on Friday November 10, 2017 @04:22PM (#15673156)
It's more "I haven't been able to do laundry/dishes in days and 30 minutes of Sesame Street videos won't hurt".