News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The rise and fall of Limux by porfirium on Thursday November 09, 2017 @01:57PM (#15664856)
>I guess other than the obvious fact that everybody working on a given linux distro is doing it for free (right? that's my impression).

People working on most components of the desktop Linux stack are being paid for it. Think kernel -> video drivers -> systemd -> wayland -> GNOME. All of those groups have paid employees. They are evidently understaffed.

Re:The rise and fall of Limux by komali2 on Thursday November 09, 2017 @02:00PM (#15664883)
Wait, really? By who? For what reason?
Re:The rise and fall of Limux by danieldk on Thursday November 09, 2017 @02:28PM (#15665150)
Red Hat, Intel, AMD, SUSE, Samsung, Canonical etc.

Obviously, a lot of paid work is done on low-level plumbing, because Linux is hugely profitable as a server, infrastructure, or embedded operating system for a lot of companies. Graphics infrastructure (KMS, Wayland, X11, etc.) is useful for companies who embed Linux in various appliances (set-op boxes, etc.). Red Hat probably invests in GNOME because for Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation and dogfooding.

Re:The rise and fall of Limux by ivanbakel on Thursday November 09, 2017 @02:10PM (#15664980)
>For what reason?

If your programmers can make your project their job, you don't have to worry about the amount of time they have to contribute.

Re:The rise and fall of Limux by watwut on Thursday November 09, 2017 @02:28PM (#15665147)
RedHat would be one company that pays for that. FOSS has yearly report on such things, if you want to google it. (I am too lazy now)