Re:A Simple Guide to Five Normal Forms in Relational Databas...
by brown9-2 on Sunday August 01, 2010 @07:39PM
(#1566375)
Wouldn't the term "junction" tell you what you need to know about this table?
"Junction", "join table", "intersection table" - really, you are going to judge someone's competency based on which flavor of a synonym they use?
Re:A Simple Guide to Five Normal Forms in Relational Databas...
by giardini on Sunday August 01, 2010 @11:48PM
(#1566773)
Why downmod him so? His implication that the term "junction table" is nonstandard terminology is correct.
Despite 45 years in IT and a good 25 years of relational databases, I don't recall having heard (or read) the term "junction table" in a technical discussion. A cursory Google search indicates it may be recent terminology from the Microsoft corner of the universe.
Re:A Simple Guide to Five Normal Forms in Relational Databas...
by Confusion on Monday August 02, 2010 @02:28AM
(#1567027)
Why downmod him so?
Probably because many here don't like someone badmouthing another over something so small.
Re:A Simple Guide to Five Normal Forms in Relational Databas...
by arethuza on Monday August 02, 2010 @05:17AM
(#1567226)
I don't think I've ever heard the term either. However, in the context I don't think it's that difficult to work out what is meant.
Re:A Simple Guide to Five Normal Forms in Relational Databas...
by sovande on Sunday August 01, 2010 @08:01PM
(#1566411)
You just added that to Wikipedia now didn't you :-)
Re:A Simple Guide to Five Normal Forms in Relational Databas...
by epochwolf on Monday August 02, 2010 @10:15AM
(#1567684)
Easiest edit: 18:07, 18 February 2006
the relational term would be relation, please stop interviewing ppl for jobs you are not qualified