News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Learning Go by porting a medium-sized web back end from P... by cjsuk on Thursday November 09, 2017 @04:34AM (#15661057)
A lot of people I know are bailing on .net because it doesn’t live up to the promises. Everyone else gets the cool stuff first, the vendor that owns it is a dick and there has been so much schizophrenia over the last few years that it’s a business risk adopting it in case you have to throw your product under a bus again.

Go is showing itself to be a good compromise especially with the simplified nature of deployment and runtime stuff. It’s like a safer, higher level C, with a decent runtime library. That has so much mileage.

I’ve learned one thing as well over the last 15 years of using .net as well. An IDE is a monolithic brain damager. If you have to do something outside the scope of it, you’re shot. Give me an extensible text editor and shell.

Re:Learning Go by porting a medium-sized web back end from P... by pjmlp on Thursday November 09, 2017 @04:40AM (#15661089)
I wonder where, in this little corner of the Earth, it keeps being Java and .NET as it has always been the last 20 years.
Re:Learning Go by porting a medium-sized web back end from P... by cjsuk on Thursday November 09, 2017 @04:42AM (#15661103)
Java is fine to be honest. It’s a good solution.

Now I’m going to duck for cover!

Re:Learning Go by porting a medium-sized web back end from P... by maxxxxx on Friday November 10, 2017 @01:55PM (#15672031)
You are pretty much describing my thought process. .NET is comfortable but the cool stuff is happening on other platforms.
Re:Learning Go by porting a medium-sized web back end from P... by pwdisswordfish on Thursday November 09, 2017 @06:46AM (#15661610)
> A lot of people I know are bailing on .net

Crazy attracts crazy, now you know.