That seems to be reading _a lot_ more than what is reasonable, based on a simple gendered noun.
For a counterpoint, in italian there is the expression "traduttore, traditore" (translator, traitor/betrayer), where the unfaithful is a man.
Re:Translator's Note to the Odyssey
by Arete3141 on Wednesday November 08, 2017 @02:48PM
(#15656244)
I had that thought at first, too. But then I thought about it: she has worked on the subtle shades of meaning in words for years in order to translate things. So the more subtle significance of the role of translator is also something she would have pondered for a lot longer than most of us. Perhaps, if someone has thought deeply on a subject and worked in a field for decades, we might listen to what she has to say instead of dismissing it out of hand because it is unfamiliar.
"When you have a hammer, you see everything as sexism".
> The sexualization of translation appears perhaps most familiarly in the tag les belles infideles--like women, the adage goes, translations should be either beautiful or faithful. The tag is made possible both by the rhyme in French and by the fact that the word traduction is a feminine one, thus making les beaux infideles impossible. This tag owes its longevity--it was coined in the seventeenth century--to more than phonetic similarity: what gives it the appearance of truth is that it has captured a cultural complicity between the issues of fidelity in translation and in marriage. For les belles infideles, fidelity is defined by an implicit contract between translation (as woman) and original (as husband, father, or author).
and gives various other examples where people use (patriarchal) marriage as an image.
[0] https://www.jstor.org/stable/3174168