Re:LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corpor...
by adamnemecek on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @12:32PM
(#15645468)
The main difference is that gamers are much better connected than movie goers I think. This sort of behavior might not have as many repercussions for movie studios as it does for gaming studios.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corpor...
by steinuil on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @12:52PM
(#15645703)
That's not necessarily true, lots of gamers are just casual gamers who will only buy the blockbusters, just as with movies, and will probably not go beyond checking the metacritic score before buying, or even worse they will preorder it before the reviews are even out.
I think the main difference is that AAA games are much more expensive than a movie ticket, so the percentage of people who do this is lower.
Re:LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corpor...
by eregorn on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @12:52PM
(#15645694)
"better" doesn't seem a good description for the gaming community's connection to studios. In many cases, gamers themselves might even strong-arm media outlets for studios with or without permission, hence the inflated scores. The recent fake review on Mario Odyssey comes to mind.
Re:LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corpor...
by cholantesh on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @03:45PM
(#15647425)
The Jim Sterling one?
Re:LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corpor...
by mrguyorama on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @12:55PM
(#15645722)
This behavior has near zero repercussions for gaming studios. Despite companies like Ubisoft blacklisting and badmouthing critics who gave honest opinions of arguably poor game design choices, these companies have never been richer