Re:Sick of Ruby, dynamic typing, side effects, and object-or...
by leshow on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @10:39AM
(#15644251)
This is like moving from Kotlin to Java or something similar. Within the domain of languages, you haven't moved that much. You stayed with dynamic type system and a JIT or interpretor. Besides a little change in syntax, what else is there.
I tend to like to hear about people switching languages that also cross paradigms, OO to Actor, Actor to FP, etc..
I tend to like to hear about people switching languages that also cross paradigms, OO to Actor, Actor to FP, etc..