Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web

Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by lovich on Friday November 03, 2017 @09:59AM (#15619258)

To me, content creators using psychology tricks to try and get the value out of me, my eyeballs for advertisers, before I have the ability to evaluate their value to me, the actual useful part of their content, is hostile.

Maybe the soup Nazi was a bad analogy, but how about a car salesman who knowingly sells you a lemon? They could be nice and polite up front and do everything they could to make you feel comfortable with making the purchase. They are still knowingly doing something to benefit themselves at your expense. If it was a choice where one side got a benefit and the other remained neutral I would see it as not hostile, but when it's a benefit for one side at the expense of the other side, it's become hostile at that point

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by s73ver_ on Friday November 03, 2017 @12:25PM (#15620355)

Your analogies are not working. They are not at all on point, and they are not at all relatable to the situation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by lovich on Friday November 03, 2017 @09:59PM (#15623441)

I think we don't agree on the definition of hostile. For me, if someone does anything to benefit themselves at my loss, it's a hostile act. There is a spectrum, trying to stab me certainly rates higher than trying to squeeze a few pennies out of a deal with me, but it's still hostile

[ Parent | on HN ]