Stack Overflow reducing headcount by 20%

Re:Stack Overflow reducing headcount by 20% by humanrebar on Friday November 03, 2017 @08:22AM (#15618568)

> It's a pretty effective union busting tool and has contributed to the decline of organized labor as a political force.

I think it's fair to say teachers have the right to be teachers without joining a teachers' union. I don't think enforcing that right "contributes to the decline" of unions. Organizational models should be able to handle that sort of freedom to choose.

To me, the question is why unions don't innovate in their organizational models and policies so that giving employees freedom to choose is moot?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stack Overflow reducing headcount by 20% by fjsolwmv on Friday November 03, 2017 @11:21AM (#15619833)

Same reason that people who live in the US don't have the freedom to choose whether they want to be governed by the US government. Social contract

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stack Overflow reducing headcount by 20% by humanrebar on Friday November 03, 2017 @05:16PM (#15622256)

But on a more concrete level, union fees go to campaigning, lobbying, and donations to candidates the union members may not support.

I don't think it's part of an American social contract that you would be forced to tangibly support candidates who have (by some accounts) immoral positions on abortion or immigration (to pick to polarizing issues).

[ Parent | on HN ]