“realdonaldtrump’s account was inadvertently deactivated due to human error”

Re:“realdonaldtrump’s account was inadvertently deactivated ... by Domenic_S on Thursday November 02, 2017 @09:01PM (#15615895)

Am I taking crazy pills? If he had said, "...then I'm going to order a nuclear strike", that would have been explicit. Saying "they won't be around much longer" is a veiled threat, the threat is implicit.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“realdonaldtrump’s account was inadvertently deactivated ... by kelnos on Thursday November 02, 2017 @09:40PM (#15616074)

What's the point of this subthread? Whether or not that particular tweet embodies an explicit or implicit threat is irrelevant. Implicit threats clearly fall under the umbrella of "abusive Twitter behavior" as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“realdonaldtrump’s account was inadvertently deactivated ... by tree_of_item on Thursday November 02, 2017 @10:27PM (#15616266)

The point is they said it was explicit, but it wasn't.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“realdonaldtrump’s account was inadvertently deactivated ... by kelnos on Tuesday November 14, 2017 @11:07PM (#15701380)

So the purpose of this thread is to enforce pedantry and ignore the actual point of the discussion. Got it.

[ Parent | on HN ]