News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by fiddlerwoaroof on Thursday November 02, 2017 @05:16PM (#15614366)
The browser could throttle the cc mining based on your battery level/power state. In theory, your device could even mine while charging and then distribute the mined tokens later.
Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by Zelizz on Thursday November 02, 2017 @05:27PM (#15614443)
Or you could distribute tokens mined from a computer that's plugged in somewhere, or even purchased with normal currency. But I'm not sure I'd want to navigate a web where I'm constantly making purchase decisions with every hyperlink.
Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by akoncius on Thursday November 02, 2017 @06:36PM (#15614947)
so why bother with additional steps (and cryptocurrency) instead of just pay with real money from the beginning? you are suggesting to introduce just additional unnecessary steps.
Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by fiddlerwoaroof on Thursday November 02, 2017 @08:42PM (#15615780)
Some kind of micropayment system would be ok with me, but the nice thing about a system that doesn’t use real money is that it doesn’t factor into my budget in the same way.
Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by chii on Thursday November 02, 2017 @09:46PM (#15616097)
how could it not use real money (i.e, it has no monetary value), and yet be an acceptable form of payment?
Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by akoncius on Thursday November 02, 2017 @06:35PM (#15614939)
so I could not get access to content if my battery is low and I cannot mine cc ? or would I get access with "credit" so I would need to return "load" later?
Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by fiddlerwoaroof on Thursday November 02, 2017 @08:36PM (#15615724)
I’m not sure, I’m just sketching out a solution to content monetization that might solve problems with current monetization schemes.
Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by akoncius on Friday November 03, 2017 @02:38AM (#15617092)
I understand, I just wanted to show that there are lots of implications and it’s not that easy to solve.