News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stack Overflow reducing headcount by 20% by gumoro on Thursday November 02, 2017 @04:31PM (#15614011)
If I understand correctly, they offer this now, your private instance for your own product(s) & team(s):

https://www.stackoverflowbusiness.com/enterprise

Edit: while interesting, this (private internal instance for your team) is not what johansch is after (separate public instance dedicated to your product, for your users)

Re:Stack Overflow reducing headcount by 20% by Corrado on Friday November 03, 2017 @05:33AM (#15617802)
I looked into using their Enterprise product for my employer about 6 months ago. It seemed to be a nice product but was shockingly expensive compared to its counterparts in the space. Also, when they say "enterprise" they meant it. They are targeting large companies with 10s of thousands of employees; our 300 user company was really on the low side. Of course this is a pretty new product and this type of thing tells me that it's not quite mature yet and probably difficult to support.
Re:Stack Overflow reducing headcount by 20% by jxramos on Thursday November 02, 2017 @04:40PM (#15614088)
this is very intriguing. Right now we use Confluence for something in this direction. I'd much rather us have a private stack overflow page for a subset of what we do on Confluence.
Re:Stack Overflow reducing headcount by 20% by johansch on Thursday November 02, 2017 @04:33PM (#15614027)
(Edit) This appears to be for non-public stuff only, though. So an internal stackoverflow.

Still no solution for a company wanting to host a public stackoverflow instance for some product.

Re:Stack Overflow reducing headcount by 20% by gumoro on Thursday November 02, 2017 @04:51PM (#15614195)
Ah, yes, right, sorry. I understand now what you were after. Agree there would have been (is?) an interesting potential there too.