News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by walterstucco on Thursday November 02, 2017 @03:03PM (#15613277)
> We are talking about things that people don’t like but are forced to get anyway.

- Driving: a lot of people drive, very few of them like it or they would learn how to do it properly

- Public transport: 99,99% of people using public transport hate it

- Going to the dentist

- eating vegetables

- taking kids to the pool

and so on…

all of this things are incredibly annoying to many, yet they have not failed

Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by akoncius on Thursday November 02, 2017 @06:41PM (#15614988)
so watching ads is a job?
Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by djeikyb on Thursday November 02, 2017 @10:44PM (#15616326)
http://www.empowr.com is a 10+ year old tech company with this as a premise.
Re:Against an Increasingly User-Hostile Web by walterstucco on Thursday November 02, 2017 @07:19PM (#15615274)
In a way, it is.

But I don't understand the connection.

The core of the issue is the proverbial "worse is better"

All the walled garden on the web are optimising one particular feature - engagement - leaving behind many others that are equally important if not more, like user's freedom or privacy.

It's no wonder that investing so much money in getting users to subscribe and use the platform results in an increase of time spent by the users on the platform.

It is orthogonal to the problem highlighted in the original post.

The net effect is so strong that any other platform that tries to enter the market either has to waste a lot of money (if they have them) or use the same techniques that are already in place to sustain their businness

The choice is on the users, but for the majority of them it's not worth it until it's too late.