News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A New Twist on Neural Networks by mcv on Thursday November 02, 2017 @10:47AM (#15610856)
> If a child observes a cat in the room for only 10 seconds, that's already between 3,000 to 10,000 samples from various perspectives.

Why does that count as 3000 - 10,000 samples? Why is it not a single sample? I don't think our brains sample image in that way. And that might be a fundamental difference between how humans process images and how we're expecting computers to do it.

Re:A New Twist on Neural Networks by madamelic on Thursday November 02, 2017 @12:00PM (#15611562)
If the cat was perfectly still, not twitching and neither were you, it would be one sample. With both entities moving, you are getting constant, discrete samples of what a "cat" is.
Re:A New Twist on Neural Networks by ben-schaaf on Thursday November 02, 2017 @10:18PM (#15616222)
I think what the GP means is that there are no discrete samples and the information stream is instead one continuous sample.