News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Risk of false positives in fMRI of post-mortem Atlantic salmon (2010) [pdf]. Parent comment

Re:Risk of false positives in fMRI of post-mortem Atlantic s... by zitterbewegung on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @08:42AM (#15600589)
Do you have any other papers that would give me karma I mean that are interesfing?

Also, which FMRI papers have real results that you think are significant?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Risk of false positives in fMRI of post-mortem Atlantic s... by neuromantik8086 on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @12:56PM (#15603191)
Josh Carp also wrote a paper on methdological misbehavior in neuroimaging a while back:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22796459

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Risk of false positives in fMRI of post-mortem Atlantic s... by prefrontal on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @12:52PM (#15603151)
Sorry man - the karma train is probably done. We wrote a few other papers on fMRI reliability, but nothing with the popularity that the salmon paper had.

There are a huge number of fMRI papers that have significant results, statistically and in terms of impact. I have been out of the field for about five years now, so I am not up-to-date with the latest work. I am sure there is some amazing stuff going on.

[ Parent | on HN ]