Re:Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology
by miranda_rights on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @02:47AM
(#15591481)
Not only that, but by now I've figured out that the comment sections of most sites are toxic with little, if any, moderation. HN has a good moderation set-up, respectful members, etc. I try to avoid even reading the comments of other websites since they just end up being depressing.
Re:Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology
by test1235 on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @05:12AM
(#15591857)
BBC is especially depressing.
Re:Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology
by redblacktree on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @10:51AM
(#15593630)
You should try Fox News.
Re:Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology
by sitkack on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @02:29AM
(#15591447)
So if true federated non-statist, non-corp entity login actually worked we would probably comment freely and purchase stuff in 0.10-0.50 increments? Mozilla should be a payments platform.
Re:Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology
by pjc50 on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @06:38AM
(#15592158)
The browser vendors are the only actors who might be able to make this work.
Re:Letting users skip our paywall if they wrote an apology
by majewsky on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @03:24PM
(#15595819)
Seeing how Google makes basically all its money from internet ads, I don't think they have any interest to enable other monetization schemes. (Unless, of course, something makes them believe that ads are going to become unattractive and they need to pivot.)
Their comment form requires login or signup. I'm already signed up and logged in here. That's reason enough for me to post here and not there. I would never create an account just to leave a comment unless it was someplace where I intended to visit and comment often.