Re:Butterfly iQ – A cheap handheld ultrasound tool with AI s...
by pcl on Monday October 30, 2017 @10:20PM
(#15590683)
Yeah, that's a really dispiriting sentiment to read.
But the good news is that it's rooted in the hopefully-soon-to-be-obsolete pricing model. If ultrasound devices really can get down into the $2000 price range, then the good doctors will buy them as a cost of doing business, and just not bill for the ultrasound readings. Wait a decade or so, and that'll percolate from the good doctors to the rest of the field.
Yes, there are perverse incentives etc. etc., but I know a number of doctors who are in it for the love of medicine and helping people. The bureaucracy changes course slowly, but those leaders can and do make a difference over time.
Re:Butterfly iQ – A cheap handheld ultrasound tool with AI s...
by pjwMD on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @11:43AM
(#15602311)
One voice does not equal the system, but in any the push by some to bill for clinician performed US is largely driven by a need to generate funds to justify to administrators the purchase of a $70k device.
We're constantly led to believe that the revolution is coming where you can snap a photo of your arm, send it to the health service and get a diganosis. That's not happening for a long time, I think.
> “And saving those images is required to bill for the scan,” he notes.
If that throwaway comment doesn't worry people, then I don't know what does. I can understand low resolution, health risks, but a principle barrier to the hospital is that they can't charge you for using it? Fuck that system, quite frankly.