None of these companies have a monopoly, and even if they did monopolies should only be regulated when they sell things we must have to live. Monopolies for luxury things are not a problem. Access to google and facebook are not essential things you need.

Access to information is not a luxury.

Google and Facebook appropriated the natural course of the evolution of information exchange between humans and should be regulated.

You don't need access to Google and Facebook to access information, there is an entire giant network out there for sharing information beyond Google and Facebook; there is zero valid reason to regulate these companies.

Except they try to keep users out of these networks and inside their platforms while having an absolute market share.

Every monopoly should be regulated and, preferably, broke up.

> Every monopoly should be regulated and, preferably, broke up.

No, they shouldn't be and the law doesn't agree with you. You have to be a bad actor before such laws apply, you shouldn't be broken up merely because no one else can compete.

> You have to be a bad actor

It's just a matter of time – their bad acting grows and it has become more visible already.

Ah the slippery slope, so basically you have no real argument then. We should punish them because they might do something wrong in the future, got it.