Fable: F# to JavaScript compiler

Re:Fable: F# to JavaScript compiler by pjmlp on Monday October 30, 2017 @03:55AM (#15583604)

How things are going, I bet those dead-end technologies have a brighter future than F#, specially when I see those Microsoft bashing comments.

If it comes to be, lets see how long F# survives without Microsoft support.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fable: F# to JavaScript compiler by edgyswingset on Monday October 30, 2017 @10:40AM (#15585264)

Microsoft bashing? Where did I do that?

I run a few things on .NET Core today and it’s great. I’ll probably runs some things in Azure soon enough. I just think UWP has no future because its primary device type (Windows phone) is dead, and it hasn’t seen any uptake in the enterprise to replace Winforms and WPF. F# seems just fine to me, and it’s supported for my app type. Perhaps you need to rethink your choices in development technologies.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fable: F# to JavaScript compiler by pjmlp on Monday October 30, 2017 @12:54PM (#15586629)

I am speaking about the tone on F# tweets and on Github coments regarding Windows, UWP and .NET Native.

I did rethink my choices in technology, F# is not worth my time for production code anymore.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fable: F# to JavaScript compiler by TensorMetric on Monday October 30, 2017 @10:56AM (#15585401)

As was stated before, UWPs primary device type is every Windows 10 device.

https://np.reddit.com/r/Windows10/comments/75lgti/announcing...

You don't seem to understand what UWP is about.

[ Parent | on HN ]