Re:Why would anyone choose Docker over fat binaries?
by notyourday on Sunday October 29, 2017 @10:26AM
(#15579432)
In my observation, Docker skills is a modern day ability to type "make", without being able to actually write a Makefile or debug a Makefile.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why would anyone choose Docker over fat binaries?
by noahwilde on Sunday October 29, 2017 @01:32PM
(#15580291)
Writing a dockerfile successfully is maybe that. But learning to make a dockerfile should take someone a day to figure out. What the entire movement is about is creating an ecosystem around a common standard for dev ops.
Re:Why would anyone choose Docker over fat binaries?
by krizzo on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @11:03PM
(#15598539)
I use Makefiles for creating docker files there is an advantage to docker from fat binaries. Both tools exist for a reason, used both wisely you can save time and effort.
Re:Why would anyone choose Docker over fat binaries?
by sigjuice on Sunday October 29, 2017 @12:46PM
(#15580001)
Yes. Each time you start a container, you are basically saying “make clean” as well.
Re:Why would anyone choose Docker over fat binaries?
by notyourday on Sunday October 29, 2017 @02:52PM
(#15580690)
Except that people who write software to be put in containers cannot write that Makefile to save their life so for something that should be a ten line dependency they manage to build entire Linux, entire X and all unneeded tool chains.
Re:Why would anyone choose Docker over fat binaries?
by tokenizerrr on Sunday October 29, 2017 @11:12AM
(#15579580)
Your observation is incorrect.