I think soneca's point was Brazil is still developing irrespective of any language barriers. So how does your statistics on PPP become an argument for that?

There lies a difference between 'developing' & 'developed' and my point regarding it is with the development pace which is comparatively slow against Brazil or any other developing nation which usually has very few language as an official one. Brazil has only one 'Portuguese' as an official language but India has far too many.

Rampant foreign interference and military juntas have a way of stunting your country's development.

Are you talking about Brazil or India here?

( I apologize in advance if it looks like I am arguing by asking questions. But I am asking because of curiosity/lack of knowledge )

Specifically Brazil here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_Military_Junta_of_19...

Decades of military rule is not good for your economy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_military_government

Not that India hasn't had more than its fair share of both over the centuries.