News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IBM scientists say radical new ‘in-memory’ architecture w... by tasty_freeze on Friday October 27, 2017 @02:29PM (#15570984)
Transistors provide something that resistors, capacitors, inductors and memristors don't, and thus they can't be replaced. That thing is gain, ie, amplification (of either voltage or current). All the others are lossy, so if you imagine some building block, then cascade N of them in a row, eventually the signal will become too weak (at some N) to be useful.
Re:IBM scientists say radical new ‘in-memory’ architecture w... by hinkley on Friday October 27, 2017 @02:33PM (#15571015)
Do you remember when IBM sold off their hard drive research division?

I was convinced this meant they knew memristors were going to kill hard drives soon and they were profit taking before killing them off.

That’s been more than ten years now. I am still waiting, but made other plans.

Re:IBM scientists say radical new ‘in-memory’ architecture w... by deelowe on Friday October 27, 2017 @02:55PM (#15571174)
In all fairness, the hd industry as a whole has shrunk considerably since. Same for servers and PCs. I think they made the right decision, but I'm not sure I'd go as far as to say they had a good strategy for what they would do once they got rid of these product lines.
Re:IBM scientists say radical new ‘in-memory’ architecture w... by Aloha on Friday October 27, 2017 @06:08PM (#15572597)
They sold it when hard drives became a commodity item - generally commodity items don't get major R&D attached to them.
Re:IBM scientists say radical new ‘in-memory’ architecture w... by manigandham on Friday October 27, 2017 @08:53PM (#15573415)
There's still plenty of R&D being done with storage: https://www.anandtech.com/show/11925/western-digital-stuns-s...