News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Soylent can no longer ship to Canada by ThrowawayR2 on Monday October 23, 2017 @10:01PM (#15538660)
That's the best counterargument you have? "Scary" chemical names? I mean, ... really?

I quite assure you that if I listed all of the compounds of "Pasteurized Whole Milk, Pasteurized Cream, Live Active Cultures, Cream" using standard chemistry nomenclature, the list would look far more intimidating to the average layperson.

Re:Soylent can no longer ship to Canada by simonsarris on Monday October 23, 2017 @10:05PM (#15538670)
My argument isn't scary chemical names. It's that you face a bad omega 3:6 ratio. I already said that in the first comment.
Re:Soylent can no longer ship to Canada by ThrowawayR2 on Monday October 23, 2017 @10:33PM (#15538775)
> My argument isn't scary chemical names.

Isn't it? You're the one bandying about phrases like "...strange synthetic meal..." and touting the ingredient lists of one meal over another.

As for bad omega 3:6 ratio, that's easily solved by eating something else that contains omega-3. Nobody says that Soylent is the only thing a person is permitted to eat.

Re:Soylent can no longer ship to Canada by DiThi on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @10:47AM (#15541937)
> Nobody says that Soylent is the only thing a person is permitted to eat.

But it's supposed to be able to be used that way, if one wants. AFAIK it doesn't warn to get omega-3 from time to time.

Re:Soylent can no longer ship to Canada by DanBC on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @12:31PM (#15542863)
> Nobody says that Soylent is the only thing a person is permitted to eat.

It has been marketed as a sole source of nutrition, and every conversation about Soylent on HN has people claiming it can be used as a sole source of nutrition.