News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by jorgemf on Monday October 23, 2017 @08:02PM (#15538041)
Half second delay? what Bluetooth are you using? I suggest you to buy something better, my 3 years old bluetooth headset doesn't have any noticeable delay.

The other examples are not really good examples: - bigger drives and faster internet connections? I don't think most of the countries where Apple sells had those things at that time. But, hey, it is a premium product, so they expect you to pay premium for other stuff too (read their new bluetooth earplugs) - faster javascript and better browser? Chrome had those things, not safary, and it did had flash too.

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by brandon272 on Monday October 23, 2017 @08:29PM (#15538183)
I have Powerbeats wireless 2 headphones and have no perceptible delay. I wouldn't be able to tolerate a half second delay.
Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by philliphaydon on Monday October 23, 2017 @09:29PM (#15538493)
If there was such thing as a 1 second delay then the tech would be dead by now. He’s just making things up.
Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by omilu on Monday October 23, 2017 @10:31PM (#15538767)
He's not making things up. I experience massive delay with bluetooth headphones, and speakers. The delay is not one second, but it's enough to make it useless for watching video.
Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by jorgemf on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @08:26AM (#15541029)
What is the delay? For me it is imperceptible (it means it is below 50ms).

I see here a lot of people talking about delays and how $2 wired earphones solve the problem. So I get people buy cheap and wants quality with their new iPhones. Cheap earphones with or without wire are always crap, the sound is horrible and the quality follows. It might be the reason of the delays: cheap stuff

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by jonknee on Monday October 23, 2017 @11:46PM (#15539049)
Apple has mastered hiding any delay with AirPods and perfectly syncs things up. No small feat because it has to sync up both left and right in addition to what’s on the screen.
Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by fps on Monday October 23, 2017 @11:57PM (#15539092)
I've never seen bluetooth audio devices that were capable of syncing video and audio in 10 years of using bluetooth audio devices. My most recent tao tronics BT headphones were great for podcasts and audio, but useless for watching video from my Moto X. Have also tested this with Anker portable speakers, Amazon Echo in BT mode, and Creative BT speakers. All are useless for video. I replaced them with a set of $9 Panasonic wired Earbuds that sound just fine and never run out of batteries.
Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by kalleboo on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @01:18AM (#15539399)
It also depends on the device (and software) you're watching video with - some are smart enough to compensate for the lag. iOS is decent at it when something uses the system APIs to play video (so not VLC), but I never had any luck back when I used Android. On that Mac I get really bad sync issues sometimes (seconds!).
Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by jorgemf on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @08:20AM (#15541002)
I use Bluetooth and never had issues with delays. I had couple of computers, couple of mobiles and 3 different Bluetooth headset during this time. My Bluetooth headsets weren't the cheapest ones either.
Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by mintplant on Monday October 23, 2017 @08:52PM (#15538297)
> I suggest you to buy something better

No thanks, I don't feel like spending more money. With my current phone I can buy compatible earphones with zero delay for as low as $1.50 a pop. Bluetooth headphones just can't beat that.

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by Bud on Monday October 23, 2017 @09:03PM (#15538344)
...and you can use all those same headphones with a current iPhone, using the adapter which is free and ships in the box.

Frankly, the ability to use $1.50 headphones is of vanishingly small significance.

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by jorgemf on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @08:02AM (#15540922)
Anything can beat $1.50 earphones. With that price I bet you the sound is going to be crap.
Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by mintplant on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @09:49AM (#15541469)
It's an extreme lower bound to make a point.

(And, actually, dollar store headphones are surprisingly decent these days. I use them to listen to podcasts in the pool, without worrying too much about whether they get wet.)

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by jorgemf on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @10:58AM (#15542041)
An average quality headphones are in the price range of bluetooth headphones. So I don't understand your point.

I couldn't find anything below 10€ with decent sound quality, and it was hard to find something at that price that was good. Moreover, they lasted around 3-6 months for me, while a 25€ Bluetooth headset I bought 3 years ago is still working and the sound is better.

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by chc on Monday October 23, 2017 @08:36PM (#15538226)
Most of Apple's major markets had pretty good Internet connections by 2012, when they started producing computers without CD drives.
Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by Tepix on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @02:27AM (#15539645)
I have bluetooth headphones (AOSO G18) that cost around 11€ (while on sale at Amazon) and they don't have a perceivable delay. They even show the battery level in iOS. Great for working out.

Looks like "AOSO" is a fantasy brand, they are also sold as "EarTime", "Dacom", "GranVela", ...

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by Shorel on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @06:33AM (#15540593)
No, I prefer to keep using my wired earphones.

In fact, I bought them AFTER I had Bluetooth earphones, because of the inconvenience of having to recharge them.

I also got gigabit Ethernet in the apartment after using Wi-fi for some time.

In fact, I see the hate of wires as an irrational behaviour. They work better in practically all cases with only minor inconvenience.

I myself don't need to be walking or moving all the time either. If there's a chair, there are cables available.

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by yoz-y on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @07:04AM (#15540695)
Wires are a major inconvenience though. Sure, at work I use a big pair of wired headphones and connect my laptop to a dock.

But when I am on the move every cable stinks. I have caught the headphones wire on doorknobs and bus ticket validators so many times that now I gladly suffer through the unreliable bluetooth to avoid that.

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by Shorel on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @08:51AM (#15541150)
I can see how wires can sometimes be problematic and I don't disagree with you. You can easily avoid most issues by having the cable under some of your clothes though.

My point is I don't think people can have an extreme opinion on the issue and still be objective, like I have seen so much online lately. Sometimes wires are better, sometimes wireless is better.

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by jorgemf on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @08:09AM (#15540949)
I use heavily earphones. They usually last between 3 and 9 months because of the fucking wire. When I am working I cannot type comfortable because of the wire, it is in the middle. When I move I always pull the wire. If I am walking with my mobile in my pocket I also pull the wire from time to time. So they always broke in the connector because of the wire. Even with a lot of care they always break in the same place. So it is around 15€ every 6 months. You can buy them cheaper but the sound is crap. My Bluetooth headset was 30€ and have been working like charm for more than 3 years now. They have 8 hours of battery life and I need to charge them less than the smartphone. So I don't get the inconvenience of charging something than last more than an smartphone.