Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou...
by refurb on Monday October 23, 2017 @03:18PM
(#15536115)
Agree. It's a poor person problem, not a minority problem. The effort some people will put into pushing identity politics is astounding.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou...
by alistairSH on Monday October 23, 2017 @06:30PM
(#15537469)
While you aren’t wrong about it being a poor problem, it would be extremely naive to believe past policies in the US haven’t contributed to some minority groups being more likely to be poor.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou...
by toasterlovin on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @09:01AM
(#15541192)
Wouldn’t it also follow then that the same policies have contributed to other minority groups being more likely to be rich (thinking mostly of Indians and Asians)? And if that’s the case, then maybe looking at this through a racial lens is largely irrelevant?
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou...
by alistairSH on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @10:10AM
(#15541626)
Most of the data I can find deals with black and white, occasionally Latino, and almost never mentions Asians. So, I don't know if your suggestion is true.
Anyways, I agree that viewing poverty solely through a racial lens is not productive. But, race does play a part. At the very minimum, blacks are more likely to be poor than whites. They are more likely to experience downward economic mobility. And more likely to experience multi-generational poverty.
And I'm sure Satya Nadella doesn't have a problem paying for a house anywhere, even though he's a minority.