I'm conflicted about this, because on the one hand, people should have a choice about things that happen to them. On the other hand, if you let them, you get things like this, or anti-vaccination movements. What can one do?
Nothing is more important than medical freedom. You're welcome to vaccinate--you have that right--but vaccines have been proven to be unsafe for many. The federal government has paid $3.6 billion to compensate, and that's after they've denied most claims (those without undeniable proof it was the fault of the vaccine).
Anti-vac is a public issue.
So will be anti-RF, if you let many people get deadly scared of radio waves.
$ /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Apple80211.framework/Versions/A/Resources/airport -s | wc -l
31
Bluetooth and other stuff work on 2.4GHz too.
You are bathed in lots of RF everyday. However its almost entirely background noise.
Buy a field strength meter have a look. Most exposure is either from the universe, or a multitude of unknown sources
Assuming one chooses to use Wifi in one's home, perhaps the criticism is still valid because such choice is just that--a choice. By contrast, one is forced to expose oneself to radio waves legally propagating in public spaces.