News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by DrScump on Saturday October 21, 2017 @07:58PM (#15524296)
Can you name examples where this oft-predicted result has actually happened (in the USA, anyway)? That certainly hasn't been the result in the Bay Area.
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by stevenbedrick on Sunday October 22, 2017 @02:01AM (#15525395)
It definitely happened in Portland when they ran the Orange line. We were house-hunting a year or two before the new light rail opened, and realtors showing houses along its route were already starting to make a point of mentioning it.

As soon as it actually opened, neighborhoods that could use it suddenly got a lot more desirable (read: expensive).

Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by asveikau on Saturday October 21, 2017 @08:39PM (#15524462)
Bethesda, Maryland. It was very sleepy before it became a metro stop. In the last 30 years it had a crap ton of development mostly centered around the metro.

Actually... Can you name a few places in a metro area that didn't experience such a boom after a transit stop was introduced? In the bay area even? I feel like I have only ever seen examples of it being good for retail, restaurants, home values.

Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by DrScump on Saturday October 21, 2017 @09:11PM (#15524551)
Metro considers itself traditional fixed rail, not light rail.

  a metro area that didn't experience such a boom
I was responding to the specific claim "Light rail will create demand to live near and locate businesses near the stations." The point isn't about whether a broad area benefits from rail (vs. no rail at all) but whether adding light rail to a fully built-out environment will drive more dense business development near the added rail and because of the addition of rail. I don't know of any USA data that supports that.
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by asveikau on Saturday October 21, 2017 @09:24PM (#15524602)
Ok. I thought you meant transit in general.

Take a ride from the Seattle airport to downtown on the light rail sometime, then. You will see a lot of nice looking apartments that didn't used to be there. And you will see some less nice neighborhoods interspersed.

Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by doingmything on Saturday October 21, 2017 @10:52PM (#15524899)
Columbia City is a perfect example of this
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by rsynnott on Sunday October 22, 2017 @07:48AM (#15526350)
This certainly happens very obviously in European cities. It’s possible that it happens less so in the US for cultural reasons, I suppose.
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by xapata on Sunday October 22, 2017 @02:37AM (#15525475)
It's happening in advance of the Beltline transit in Atlanta. The Beltline has been building out park/trail and surrounding neighborhoods are doing very well. The light rail is currently just a promise.
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by briandear on Saturday October 21, 2017 @09:14PM (#15524563)
Definitely didn’t happen in Houston. There was a spike of enthusiasm but light rail proximity has almost no effect on property values.
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by brewdad on Sunday October 22, 2017 @01:07PM (#15527760)
Is Houston's light rail actually useful? Last I knew it really only ran from one end of downtown to the other.
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by xapata on Sunday October 22, 2017 @02:40AM (#15525479)
Houston is a bit too spread out. Where can you get to on the rail?
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by yesiamyourdad on Saturday October 21, 2017 @10:55PM (#15524914)
Denver. Lots of high density developments near the light rail and A line (technically commuter rail) stops.
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus by solipsism on Saturday October 21, 2017 @08:27PM (#15524417)
Chicago and "El" train stops.