The U.S. Is Retreating from Religion

Re:The U.S. Is Retreating from Religion by the-dude on Friday October 20, 2017 @11:42AM (#15516627)

It is a hair style.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The U.S. Is Retreating from Religion by 24gttghh on Friday October 20, 2017 @11:46AM (#15516661)

Uh no it's a lack thereof.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The U.S. Is Retreating from Religion by the-dude on Friday October 20, 2017 @11:52AM (#15516726)

I am sure you can have hair and still be considered bald.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The U.S. Is Retreating from Religion by ceejayoz on Friday October 20, 2017 @11:52AM (#15516718)

No, it's a complete lack of hair.

Nudity is not a set of clothing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The U.S. Is Retreating from Religion by the-dude on Friday October 20, 2017 @11:55AM (#15516750)

See my other reply too, but let me ask : would you call Steve Ballmer bald or not?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The U.S. Is Retreating from Religion by ceejayoz on Friday October 20, 2017 @01:10PM (#15517387)

I'd call him mostly bald.

He's welcome to style what hair he has left.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The U.S. Is Retreating from Religion by Spivak on Friday October 20, 2017 @12:00PM (#15516802)

I love word arguments. The empty set is still a set.

Nudity is wearing the empty set of clothing.

[ Parent | on HN ]