News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Analyzing HN moderation and censorship by oftenbanned on Thursday October 19, 2017 @10:34AM (#15508242)
Well only one at a time. Then as each gets banned I make another one. Note that they get banned if I just visit HN from the IP in question no posting required.
Re:Analyzing HN moderation and censorship by dsr_ on Thursday October 19, 2017 @01:11PM (#15509651)
... if all of your nyms get banned, it might be that you are consistently behaving in a way that the moderators don't like.

Have you considered, perhaps, changing your behavior?

Re:Analyzing HN moderation and censorship by oftenbanned on Thursday October 19, 2017 @01:44PM (#15509928)
You’re not really comprehending what I am saying. If I create an account, never post or comment, and just browse HN from the IP in question, that account will be banned. It has nothing to do with behavior.
Re:Analyzing HN moderation and censorship by dang on Friday October 20, 2017 @02:52AM (#15513960)
Nobody gets banned just by browsing.

If you're concerned about a specific IP, and haven't been abusing HN, it should be easy to clear up by emailing [email protected]. And even if you have been abusing HN, we're always happy to unban people (and/or their IPs) if they give us reason to believe that they've taken https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html to heart and will follow the rules in the future.

Re:Analyzing HN moderation and censorship by oftenbanned on Friday October 20, 2017 @05:28PM (#15519226)
This is not accurate based on my testing. If I browse to HN while logged in to my account from the affected network, that account can never post properly again.
Re:Analyzing HN moderation and censorship by grzm on Friday October 20, 2017 @05:33PM (#15519250)
At this point, three people, including a mod, have suggested you contact the mods via email to investigate further and get to the bottom of your particular situation. Have you done so? If not, that does seem to be the most constructive way forward.
Re:Analyzing HN moderation and censorship by oftenbanned on Friday October 20, 2017 @05:35PM (#15519266)
The article is about bringing transparency to HN operations. To allow what I believe to be a factually inaccurate statement by one of the operators just stand as the last word is against the spirit of the discussion.
Re:Analyzing HN moderation and censorship by grzm on Friday October 20, 2017 @05:43PM (#15519313)
Okay. For the sake of discussion, what would satisfy you in terms of transparency? Perhaps I'm misreading you, and please do correct me if I am, but it seems you've arrived at a conclusion of bad faith on the part of mods. What would move the conversation productively forward?

Edit to add: Without more details from you, I can imagine the mods being hamstrung with respect to figuring out or explaining what's going with what you're observing. Likewise, there's nothing preventing you from continuing your comments here while also emailing them. Particularly as it seems you'd like to continue to participate on HN. I can imagine you'd prefer to do so without the hassle you're currently experiencing.

Re:Analyzing HN moderation and censorship by dsr_ on Thursday October 19, 2017 @04:18PM (#15511214)
Yeah, that didn't come through at all. My apologies.