News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Mathematical Genius of Auto-Tune by thearn4 on Monday October 16, 2017 @03:08PM (#15485808)
FFT is a pretty cool thing. But yeah, this "trick" has been used for correlation-based computations for quite awhile.

Assuming that it's the trick that the author was referring to, the article is actually a bit sparse on details.

Re:The Mathematical Genius of Auto-Tune by soundwave106 on Monday October 16, 2017 @04:48PM (#15486531)
The patent for Autotune can be found here: https://www.google.com/patents/US5973252?dq=5,973,252

My (very non-expert) reading of the patent is that it uses sample reduction and some specific features of the periodic form of the human voice to simplify the math involved in the auto-correlation routine. Although this routine does seem to be unique as far as I know, I wouldn't be surprised if it shares similarities to other techniques to reduce correlation complexity.

Re:The Mathematical Genius of Auto-Tune by hamiltonkibbe on Monday October 16, 2017 @05:21PM (#15486728)
Polyphase filters maybe? It's an approach used primarily in resampling, and its an easy way to skip a LOT of Multiply-by-zero-and-Accumulate-ing
Re:The Mathematical Genius of Auto-Tune by nejenendn on Monday October 16, 2017 @09:32PM (#15488002)
It decoded to a phase vocoder on the nearest semitones.
Re:The Mathematical Genius of Auto-Tune by dspig on Tuesday October 17, 2017 @02:35AM (#15489088)
read the patent - all time domain, no phase vocoder involved.
Re:The Mathematical Genius of Auto-Tune by amelius on Monday October 16, 2017 @06:57PM (#15487329)
> “I realized that most of the arithmetic was redundant, and could be simplified,” he says. “My simplification changed a million multiply adds into just four.”

Doesn't sound like FFT.