Re:We are doing it wrong – the truth about agile development
by AnimalMuppet on Monday October 16, 2017 @12:58PM
(#15484731)
> To me, agile is endless micromanagement.
That is almost the exact opposite of agile. Unfortunately, the label "agile" gets pasted on some things that are very far from really being agile.
For this reason, be suspicious of anything labeled "agile". But don't automatically reject it - there is some real agile out there, and it's a whole different environment when it works.
Re:We are doing it wrong – the truth about agile development
by tincholio on Monday October 16, 2017 @12:02PM
(#15484199)
The last company I worked at had officially switched to "agile" last year (even though in practice, it had been working that way since earlier). They sent some guy from the India office (halfway around the world) to discuss with the different scrum teams about "ceremonies", "retrospectives", and all kinds of similar BS. That definitely smells of a cult.
To me, agile is endless micromanagement. Tracking every little thing in JIRA and having constant pointless meetings. The next time I look for a job, I'm going to categorically rule out any company that uses JIRA at all.
And then there's a particular quality associated with agile that just comes off as cult-like. A while back, I was googling "scrum master" to find out what one actually did, and I stumbled on the official scrum page [0]. Some of the terminology on that page just jumps out at me saying "this is a cult" (in particular, the phrase "servant-leader" is used in an almost religious sense). If someone were to state what's on that page in real life, I'd start backing away slowly. And the cult-like feel is only reinforced by the agile community's peculiar use of ordinary words such as "story".
[0] https://www.scrum.org/resources/what-is-a-scrum-master