News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:F.lux v4 by internet2000 on Saturday October 14, 2017 @10:04AM (#15472208)
Reminder that both Mac OS and Windows include blue light reducing as a built-in feature. In case you don't like installing applications for something the OS already does like me.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT207513

https://www.howtogeek.com/302186/how-to-enable-night-light-o...

Re:F.lux v4 by gottebp on Saturday October 14, 2017 @11:32AM (#15472596)
I use F.lux because they are the little guy, and first to this market by a long shot. Getting Sherlocked [1] by the big players after years of original work on a project is terrible. Lots of small businesses (or projects for that matter) is much preferable to a handful of large ones blatantly cloning ideas they did not originate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_(software)

Re:F.lux v4 by dannyw on Saturday October 14, 2017 @12:35PM (#15472925)
Should OS makers not improve their OS based on what’s out there in the market, and purposefully harm the user experience then?

Night Shift is a simple concept and there’s not a huge amount of different ways to do it. It’s something I consider analogous to copy and paste, a trashcan, or a clock in your dock.

Re:F.lux v4 by gottebp on Saturday October 14, 2017 @01:17PM (#15473120)
Every idea looks simple and obvious in hindsight.

When a small business has an idea it is their whole world. They think about it day and night and have to constantly improve upon it or die. A small idea can sustain a small business. A small idea to a large corporation though is a blip on the radar, and so has little incentive to continue being improved. This is now a tiny feature in a big company, mainly added for a keynote announcement and for marketing purposes, with little value to their bottom line down the road.

Prediction: Going forward I expect NightShift to improve at about the same rate as Finder.

F.lux was out for years before the big players finally realized what a good idea it was. It was copied without the slightest attribution or thank you. It may be legal, however not very ethical and rather dishonorable if you ask me. This path leads to a future where only big players exist. Invention by individuals is disincentivized if it will just get copied at the first sign of success.

Re:F.lux v4 by skinnymuch on Sunday October 15, 2017 @01:00AM (#15475973)
Apple has taken ideas quite a bit. There's a term for it in the Mac world and in the iOS world they are infamous for "taking" tweaks done in the jailbreaking community. Rarely if ever is there any compensation or recognition given.

That's not right. Apple also many times doesn't not iterate as much as the independent developer would. But they do effectively kill off the small guy's work nonetheless.

That doesn't sit right with me.

Regarding ideas. People say that about so many things especially with features the big guys take. With hindsight it is done even more.

Re:F.lux v4 by toomuchtodo on Saturday October 14, 2017 @12:47PM (#15472970)
The chance of flux going away is much less than Apple suddenly deciding "We don't want to offer this feature anymore."
Re:F.lux v4 by pwinnski on Saturday October 14, 2017 @05:05PM (#15474300)
History suggests this is not correct.

Long-time Mac users have a term for this: Sherlocking[0]

It seems far more likely that a company without an obvious business plan might run out of money trying to sell software that seems to be an unnecessary duplication of features built in to the OS than for Apple to eliminate a feature they've only recently introduced and promoted.

I'm hoping neither happen, and I wish the f.lux team the best, but I definitely think you have the odds the wrong way around.

[0] https://carpeaqua.com/2013/10/18/stop-sherlocking-yourself/

Re:F.lux v4 by skinnymuch on Sunday October 15, 2017 @01:02AM (#15475977)
Flux is on version 4 and has been around for a very long time. Dare I say a decade now? Apple probably barely cares about the feature. You think they're going to iterate on it close to as much as Flux? History certainly does not show that.
Re:F.lux v4 by azdle on Saturday October 14, 2017 @10:32AM (#15472316)
Re:F.lux v4 by Ruud-v-A on Saturday October 14, 2017 @10:48AM (#15472386)
Yes, I’ve been happily using this feature since it was introduced.
Re:F.lux v4 by sandGorgon on Saturday October 14, 2017 @01:14PM (#15473109)
Works brilliantly on Fedora.
Re:F.lux v4 by hn_throwaway_99 on Saturday October 14, 2017 @11:36AM (#15472609)
I have been using f.lux for years, and was happy that when NightShift became available that I could just use it.

The short of it is that, for me at least, NightShift is almost useless. It simply does not get red or dim enough if I'm reading right before bed. Same thing goes for Android, which is why I have Twilight still installed there. Seems like such an easy option to make the color temperature more customizable, so I think it sucks that Apple didn't do this.

Re:F.lux v4 by eat_veggies on Saturday October 14, 2017 @12:06PM (#15472751)
I've had better experience with CF.lumen on Android (you need root though) because it's more of a tint than an overlay, so blacks stay black and not dark red like with Twilight.
Re:F.lux v4 by reificator on Saturday October 14, 2017 @02:31PM (#15473480)
That's why I've always disliked Twilight! I couldn't put my finger on it, I thought it was just the color choice.

Thanks for the recommendation!

Re:F.lux v4 by skinnymuch on Sunday October 15, 2017 @12:57AM (#15475966)
MacOS's feature at least is far weaker than Flux by a longshot. It doesn't tint the colors nearly enough. Sure the OS technically does what Flux does, but when the third Parth app is so much better, it makes sense to use it. Also Flux came out far before. And no thank you or notice has been given to them by the big guys. For that reason alone I'd continue to use Flux.
Re:F.lux v4 by skrebbel on Saturday October 14, 2017 @01:47PM (#15473274)
I must admit I stopped using f.lux when Windows 10 came with Night Light, however this update is making me reconsider. I really like the wake-up-time idea, as well as considering "early evening" a separate time interval for which a color temperature is stored.
Re:F.lux v4 by Something1234 on Saturday October 14, 2017 @05:16PM (#15474356)
It's also in GNOME3, or at least I think it is. I got it when I installed the GNOME group on arch via pacman.
Re:F.lux v4 by nasredin on Saturday October 14, 2017 @02:34PM (#15473496)
Only the latest version include this feature.

If you use Windows 7 you have to go third-party.

The older iOS also doesn't have it.

Re:F.lux v4 by _arvin on Saturday October 14, 2017 @11:13AM (#15472511)
Not for all models though. My 2010 MBP can't use Night Shift, for example.
Re:F.lux v4 by Fnoord on Tuesday October 17, 2017 @08:56AM (#15490506)
My MBP 2010 works just fine with Night Shift.
Re:F.lux v4 by _arvin on Thursday October 19, 2017 @04:00PM (#15511078)
Is that right? Apple's own website says it doesn't. Aside from that, I can confirm it doesn't show up as an option on my Mac.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT207513

MacBook models from early 2015 or later

MacBook Air models from mid 2012 or later

MacBook Pro models from mid 2012 or later

So, what's the deal? How's it working on yours?

Re:F.lux v4 by Fnoord on Thursday October 19, 2017 @06:17PM (#15512023)
You're right, it doesn't. I thought it did, but it doesn't. Even uninstalled F.lux on it because I thought it would. Its my partner's laptop nowadays. I reinstalled F.lux on it. Thanks for the heads up
Re:F.lux v4 by _arvin on Thursday October 19, 2017 @11:02PM (#15513279)
Ahh, gotcha. All good :)
Re:F.lux v4 by wereHamster on Saturday October 14, 2017 @11:11AM (#15472498)
> Night Shift requires macOS Sierra 10.12.4 [...]

Not everybody is on Sierra yet. My work laptop still runs El Capitan.

Re:F.lux v4 by Razengan on Saturday October 14, 2017 @02:24PM (#15473448)
Curious; apart from not needing any of the new features in Sierra+, and not wanting to risk bricking your primary work machine, what’s preventing you from upgrading?
Re:F.lux v4 by wereHamster on Sunday October 15, 2017 @11:52AM (#15477638)
I have work to do at $dayjob and for that purpose the laptop works just fine. I don't want to risk any upgrade, especially after I heard that some tools and applications I use don't work well under High Sierra.
Re:F.lux v4 by skinnymuch on Sunday October 15, 2017 @01:04AM (#15475980)
I guess the counter question is, why upgrade? I'm usually a version or two behind on Mac and iOS. The features added are usually minor. Never seems to be a reason to upgrade quickly.
Re:F.lux v4 by dingo_bat on Saturday October 14, 2017 @10:10AM (#15472232)
And both of them work better than flux and have more customization options. There's literally no reason for flux to exist anymore.

Edit: also android and ios

Re:F.lux v4 by Elidrake42 on Saturday October 14, 2017 @11:13AM (#15472508)
I can't speak for the Windows implementation, but this is far from true on the Mac OS 'Nightshift' implementation. Nightshift won't get nearly as warm as I prefer it, misses the Hue integration, misses having multiple levels for particular times of the day, general quick disable, disable by application, disable when in full-screen application... The list goes on. There are plenty of reasons to still be using Flux on Mac.
Re:F.lux v4 by Razengan on Saturday October 14, 2017 @02:26PM (#15473455)
> Nightshift won't get nearly as warm as I prefer it

Configurable in System Preferences -> Displays.

> general quick disable

There’s a toggle in the Notification Center, at the top (may have to scroll/pull down.)

Re:F.lux v4 by hn_throwaway_99 on Saturday October 14, 2017 @05:12PM (#15474334)
>> Nightshift won't get nearly as warm as I prefer it

> Configurable in System Preferences -> Displays.

The whole problem is that it isn't configurable to get as warm as many people (myself included) prefer.

Re:F.lux v4 by Scramblejams on Saturday October 14, 2017 @12:07PM (#15472756)
Nope nope nope. The built-in options still emit too much blue for my taste.
Re:F.lux v4 by angrydev on Saturday October 14, 2017 @11:56AM (#15472691)
Tried to switch from Flux to Windows 10 nightlight, was awful. If you wake your computer from sleep after sunset, nightlight doesn’t activate automatically. Been a known issue since they released it.
Re:F.lux v4 by dingo_bat on Saturday October 14, 2017 @01:23PM (#15473152)
Fixed in creator's update.
Re:F.lux v4 by shawnz on Saturday October 14, 2017 @11:21AM (#15472548)
The only options in the Windows implementation are "colour temperature at night", "on time" and "off time". So that's objectively much less customizable than flux.
Re:F.lux v4 by icebraining on Saturday October 14, 2017 @12:12PM (#15472778)
Android might have it, but Android users certainly don't. Nougat and Oreo combined are still under 20%.
Re:F.lux v4 by dingo_bat on Saturday October 14, 2017 @01:24PM (#15473154)
Doesn't matter. OEMs have included it in MM too.
Re:F.lux v4 by DesertBattery on Saturday October 14, 2017 @02:00PM (#15473325)
Don't know about other OEMs but Xiaomi's implementation is awful.
Re:F.lux v4 by icebraining on Saturday October 14, 2017 @01:47PM (#15473273)
Oh. Mine doesn't, so I hadn't realize that.