Re:Hyperloop One Becomes ‘Virgin Hyperloop One’
by mhermher on Thursday October 12, 2017 @01:17PM
(#15459546)
It's not redundant with amtrak. There's no way to get from LA to SD on passenger rail without transferring through busses.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hyperloop One Becomes ‘Virgin Hyperloop One’
by k_sh on Thursday October 12, 2017 @02:16PM
(#15459988)
The Coastal Starlight runs from Union Station in DTLA to Jack London Square in Oakland. From there, it's a quick walk to BART to get into San Francisco - no bus required.
That being said, the trip takes 13 hours and some change, depending where in SF you're trying to go - which would be blown out of the water by HSR.
Re:Hyperloop One Becomes ‘Virgin Hyperloop One’
by mhermher on Thursday October 12, 2017 @02:51PM
(#15460308)
That must be new. That wasn't available as of like we years ago or so.
Re:Hyperloop One Becomes ‘Virgin Hyperloop One’
by ac29 on Thursday October 12, 2017 @04:36PM
(#15461108)
That rail route has ran continuously since 1971: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coast_Starlight. The transbay tube connecting Oakland to San Francisco via BART opened in 1974.
Re:Hyperloop One Becomes ‘Virgin Hyperloop One’
by rrix2 on Thursday October 12, 2017 @06:21PM
(#15461769)
it's worth noting that coast starlight's once-a-day-each-way schedule sort of makes it limited as a commuter rail option.
Re:Hyperloop One Becomes ‘Virgin Hyperloop One’
by ac29 on Friday October 13, 2017 @12:10AM
(#15463221)
Its too long and slow to be commuter rail anyways. The Bay Area -> LA segment takes about 12 hours (of a total 35ish), if its on time (its often multiple hours late). Even if it was never late and left every hour, it wouldnt be a very practical commute.
It is fun if you enjoy trains though! Take it if you have the time.