Re:Roman Empire per capita GDP shows the Romans were poorer ...
by randomThoughts9 on Thursday October 12, 2017 @04:45AM
(#15456559)
I wasn't claiming anything, just providing a different perspective (see the "might" in my sentence).
But could you please shed some light on this sentence:
> Yet, bonobos are indeed known for organizing attacks on neighboring primate groups
Are those primates other bonobos? That could be called going to war. If not, it's called hunting: those other primates are just food. It's not like we go to war against whatever other animals we are eating.
Re:Roman Empire per capita GDP shows the Romans were poorer ...
by tinkerrr on Thursday October 12, 2017 @05:38AM
(#15456758)
There's Lynn Saxon's book The Naked Bonobo that debunks a lot of popular myths about Bonobos - https://www.amazon.com/Naked-Bonobo-Lynn-Saxon/dp/1523945516
To the parent's comment though, bonobos don't actually form patrols and they tend to avoid contact with other groups, so intra-group conflict is lower for bonobos than chimpanzees.
It appears that some people prefer to focus on a very specific behavioral trait pinned on bonobos (having sex with group members to diffuse conflicts) just because it fits their preconceived notion of an ideal outcome involving absence of conflicts in general and war in particular. Some people even pin the name "hippie ape" in what looks like a desperate attempt to validate their personal ideals. Yet, bonobos are indeed known for organizing attacks on neighboring primate groups for the express purpose of killing and even eating them.